Best solar companies California Tesla Energy

Tesla Energy Reviews

Based in Hawthorne, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

215,064verified installs in California utility records*
10,101recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2006first year in county records
5.5/10Solar.com Score · 1,345 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Tesla Energy

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 1,345 substantive published Tesla Energy review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

5.5/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 1,345 substantive customer review texts (1,357 published reviews collected).

Google 4.0★ · 51 reviewsYelp 3.3★ · 1,306 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.7.4

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.3.6

436 reviews speak to this · 136 praise · 295 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.3.1

369 reviews speak to this · 104 praise · 260 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.3.8

820 reviews speak to this · 327 praise · 486 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.4.5

560 reviews speak to this · 255 praise · 287 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.7.1

692 reviews speak to this · 528 praise · 160 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.6.1

424 reviews speak to this · 196 praise · 223 complaints

#640 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Tesla Energy compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Tesla Energy builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
San Diego County23,44657020085.2 kW27.6%See county ranking →
Los Angeles County21,7411,22220075.6 kW42.7%See county ranking →
Orange County16,52791220086.2 kW36.3%See county ranking →
Santa Clara County16,2161,33220065.8 kW17.0%See county ranking →
Riverside County16,13780420085.8 kW48.3%See county ranking →
Alameda County14,07283820064.9 kW17.3%See county ranking →
Contra Costa County14,03680220065.9 kW22.7%See county ranking →
San Bernardino County11,02662920086.1 kW40.6%See county ranking →
Fresno County9,24825320075.9 kW42.8%See county ranking →
Kern County8,83520320076.2 kW39.3%See county ranking →

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Tesla Energy reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback across Google and Yelp, updated September 23, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity3.6/10

Reviewers describe a sales process that can be helpful at the start, with some quick quotes and design guidance, but the overall pattern is dominated by complaints about proposal accuracy and contract expectations. Common issues include overpromised system scope, missed constraints, and difficulty getting clear follow-through after signing.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Proposal and scope mismatches. Many reviewers report that what was proposed did not match what was later delivered or expected, including concerns about incomplete system coverage or missing project constraints. The feedback often centers on clarity problems before the contract is finalized. Representative review excerpt: "They are only offering 11 panels, leaving my roof incomplete and failing to deliver the promised 100% energy offset."

Follow-through breaks down after signing. A recurring complaint is that communication and ownership weaken once the contract is in place, leaving customers waiting for updates or escalation. Reviewers describe that as a source of cancellation and frustration. Representative review excerpt: "My sales guy was really nice, very personable, called me frequently, until we signed the contract."

Helpful early design for some. Some reviewers say the sales team helped them choose the right system size and moved quickly with a usable design. These comments suggest the early planning stage can feel straightforward when it goes smoothly. Representative review excerpt: "The Tesla project manager/advisor was very helpful in brainstorming various options of configuring my system and guided me in making the right decision."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency3.1/10

Feedback on pricing and financing is mostly negative, with more complaints than praise. Reviewers describe unclear deposits, refunds, billing changes, and incentive timing issues, while a smaller set say the financing terms were workable or the ordering process stayed easy to understand.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Unclear charges and refund handling. Many reviewers report surprise costs, refund deductions, or other billing changes that were not clear up front. The pattern suggests customers often felt they had to track the money side closely themselves. Representative review excerpt: "The message stated that not much had been done on my account and that my refund would only have a deduction of $2000."

Incentive and payment timing confusion. Other complaints focus on when payments, applications, or incentive-related steps were handled, with some customers saying the timing was not what they expected. That uncertainty appears repeatedly in the review set. Representative review excerpt: "I contacted Tesla and got a representative (in Nevada) to walk me through the process, paid my $100 deposit, took at least 25 pictures of my homes electrical system and..."

Financing can be workable. Some reviewers say the financing structure or ordering process made the project manageable and easy to approve. These comments are present, but they are outweighed by billing-related concerns. Representative review excerpt: "Tesla understood my energy needs and have made it very easy to order and approve the plans for my solar project."

Communication & coordination

Communication3.8/10

Communication is a major pain point in the review corpus. While some customers describe responsive staff and clear updates, many more report slow replies, repeated handoffs, and difficulty getting someone to own the project or service issue.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Hard to reach or get callbacks. A common complaint is that emails and phone calls go unanswered or take too long to get a response. Reviewers often describe that as making even simple follow-up feel drawn out. Representative review excerpt: "Not to mention, never being able to get anyone on the phone for service or emergencies."

Coordination improves only after the customer pushes. Some reviews suggest progress happened only after the customer initiated contact or escalated the issue. That points to uneven ownership across the project lifecycle. Representative review excerpt: "So I find a number on email and called and thats when the ball got started."

Responsive teams do get praise. A number of reviewers say they received quick replies, clear explanations, and professional help once they reached the right contact. Those positive experiences are present, but they are not the dominant theme. Representative review excerpt: "The online support staff responded quickly, communicated clearly, and handled every question with professionalism and courtesy."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability4.5/10

Timeline feedback is mixed but leans negative. Some reviewers say delays were tied to city inspections or utility steps and that the process eventually moved forward, but many others describe repeated delays, canceled visits, and slow movement from install to activation.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Repeated schedule delays. Many reviewers report delays after delays, including failed inspections or installation dates that changed without enough notice. This is one of the clearest complaint patterns in the timeline category. Representative review excerpt: "Imagine delay after delay and failed inspections."

Long gaps with little project movement. Other reviews describe long stretches after installation with no updates, no inspections scheduled, or unclear next steps. That leaves customers waiting without a clear timeline to activation. Representative review excerpt: "After the installation, a long period of time passed with no news and no inspections scheduled."

Some delays are framed as external. A subset of reviewers says the schedule ran long, but that the main slowdowns came from inspections or utility-side steps rather than Tesla itself. These customers still describe the process as eventually moving forward. Representative review excerpt: "The overall timeline ran longer than I anticipated, but the slowdowns were almost always tied to city inspections — not Tesla."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship7.1/10

Installation quality is one of Tesla Energy’s stronger areas in the review data, with many customers praising clean, professional crews and tidy job sites. Even so, the complaint side is real, especially around roof damage, leaks, broken tiles, and imperfect repair follow-up.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Clean, professional crews. Many reviewers praise installers for being on time, organized, and leaving the work area clean. These comments make site care and crew professionalism a clear strength in the corpus. Representative review excerpt: "Came on time, organized the place well, gave us a good idea of what to expect, did their job well and a fantastic clean-up."

Damage and repair concerns. Negative reviews describe roof or interior damage, broken tiles, leaks, and incomplete repairs after installation. Those complaints show up often enough to keep this category from being purely positive. Representative review excerpt: "Roofers break tiles and when they do come to repair they break more and do not replace."

Some jobs take longer than expected. A few customers mention longer install windows or logistical issues such as missing parts, even when they were satisfied with the crew’s effort. That makes the workmanship picture generally good, but not uniformly smooth. Representative review excerpt: "the installation crew was also not given enough parts and had to drive many miles to get what they needed."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support6.1/10

Post-install experiences are split. Some reviewers report strong energy production, good backup behavior during outages, and systems that work well once active, but a sizable set of complaints focuses on equipment failures, hard-to-reach support, and slow troubleshooting after the sale.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Support can be difficult to reach. A major complaint is difficulty getting customer support to respond when equipment stops working or needs service. Reviewers describe repeated contacts and slow resolution when they needed help most. Representative review excerpt: "It was a nightmare to reach customer support, and they referred me to different tiers, not providing real ECDs and not wanting to send a technician onsite, stating that they..."

New systems sometimes get a watch period. A few reviewers hold back judgment while they monitor how the system performs over time. That suggests some customers are still waiting to see whether the setup remains stable after activation. Representative review excerpt: "I recently had the system installed and I am giving a 4 star review as I feel that I need to hold back on how efficiently it works and the..."

Strong early performance for some. Some reviewers say the system produced power as expected and performed well during outages once it was running. These comments show that post-install satisfaction is possible when the equipment is operating normally. Representative review excerpt: "Already had an outage that I didn't even notice was happening when the power company swapped my meter and my battery kicked in without even one lightbulb flickering."

Bottom line: Tesla Energy’s review profile is mixed overall, with stronger marks for installation workmanship and weaker marks for sales clarity, pricing transparency, and communication. Reviewers most often describe delays, unclear follow-through, and service frustrations, while a smaller group reports smooth installs and solid system performance once active.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (56 Google reviews averaging 4.1 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Tesla Energy

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Also files CPUC records as: Solarcitymh, Solarcity Corporation Amy, Solar City, Solarcity Corporation Tiffany, Tesla, Solarcity Corporation Amanda Tsai, Tesla-Energy-Operations-, Solarcity Dba, Solarcity Corporation Julia, Tesla Energy Operations, Solarcity Corporation Dba, Solarcity Corporation Ryan, Solarcity Corporation Shair Weir, Tesla / Solarcity, Solarcity Corporation Gary Janis, Solarcity Corporation Dana Dahlstedt, Solarcity Corporation Shauna Eubank.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
4
2006
401
'07
624
'08
914
'09
1071
'10
2248
'11
3458
'12
10259
'13
18877
'14
39543
'15
32339
'16
16273
'17
14163
'18
8468
'19
10496
'20
12627
'21
14694
'22
12682
'23
6316
'24
7055
'25
3046
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Tesla Energy

What do customers say in Tesla Energy reviews?

We analyzed 1,345 substantive published customer reviews of Tesla Energy in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 5.5/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Tesla Energy installed?

Tesla Energy appears as installer of record on 215,096+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Tesla Energy's pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.